Shortly after Pope Benedict XVI's election in 2005, President Bush met with a small circle of advisers in the Oval Office. As some mentioned their own religious backgrounds, the president remarked that he had read one of the new pontiff's books about faith and culture in Western Europe.
Save for one other soul, Bush was the only non-Catholic in the room. But his interest in the pope's writings was no surprise to those around him. As the White House prepares to welcome Benedict on Tuesday, many in Bush's inner circle expect the pontiff to find a kindred spirit in the president. Because if Bill Clinton can be called America's first black president, some say, then George W. Bush could well be the nation's first Catholic president.
This isn't as strange a notion as it sounds. Yes, there was John F. Kennedy. But where Kennedy sought to divorce his religion from his office, Bush has welcomed Roman Catholic doctrine and teachings into the White House and based many important domestic policy decisions on them.
"I don't think there's any question about it," says Rick Santorum, former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania and a devout Catholic, who was the first to give Bush the "Catholic president" label. "He's certainly much more Catholic than Kennedy."
Bush attends an Episcopal church in Washington and belongs to a Methodist church in Texas, and his political base is solidly evangelical. Yet this Protestant president has surrounded himself with Roman Catholic intellectuals, speechwriters, professors, priests, bishops and politicians. These Catholics -- and thus Catholic social teaching -- have for the past eight years been shaping Bush's speeches, policies and legacy to a degree perhaps unprecedented in U.S. history.
"I used to say that there are more Catholics on President Bush's speechwriting team than on any Notre Dame starting lineup in the past half-century," said former Bush scribe -- and Catholic -- William McGurn.
Bush has also placed Catholics in prominent roles in the federal government and relied on Catholic tradition to make a public case for everything from his faith-based initiative to antiabortion legislation. He has wedded Catholic intellectualism with evangelical political savvy to forge a powerful electoral coalition.
"There is an awareness in the White House that the rich Catholic intellectual tradition is a resource for making the links between Christian faith, religiously grounded moral judgments and public policy," says Richard John Neuhaus, a Catholic priest and editor of the journal First Things who has tutored Bush in the church's social doctrines for nearly a decade.
In the late 1950s, Kennedy's Catholicism was a political albatross, and he labored to distance himself from his church. Accepting the Democratic nomination in 1960, he declared his religion "not relevant."
Bush and his administration, by contrast, have had no such qualms about their Catholic connections. At times, they've even seemed to brandish them for political purposes. Even before he got to the White House, Bush and his political guru Karl Rove invited Catholic intellectuals to Texas to instruct the candidate on the church's social teachings. In January 2001, Bush's first public outing as president in the nation's capital was a dinner with Washington's then-archbishop, Theodore McCarrick. A few months later, Rove (an Episcopalian) asked former White House Catholic adviser Deal Hudson to find a priest to bless his West Wing office.
"There was a very self-conscious awareness that religious conservatives had brought Bush into the White House and that [the administration] wanted to do what they had been mandated to do," says Hudson.
To conservative Catholics, that meant holding the line on same-sex marriage, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research, and working to limit abortion in the United States and abroad while nominating judges who would eventually outlaw it. To make the case, Bush has often borrowed Pope John Paul II's mantra of promoting a "culture of life." Many Catholics close to him believe that the approximately 300 judges he has seated on the federal bench -- most notably Catholics John Roberts and Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court -- may yet be his greatest legacy.
Bush also used Catholic doctrine and rhetoric to push his faith-based initiative, a movement to open federal funding to grass-roots religious groups that provide social services to their communities. Much of that initiative is based on the Catholic principle of "subsidiarity" -- the idea that local people are in the best position to solve local problems. "The president probably knows absolutely nothing about the Catholic catechism, but he's very familiar with the principle of subsidiarity," said H. James Towey, former director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives who is now the president of a Catholic college in southwestern Pennsylvania. "It's the sense that the government is not the savior and that problems like poverty have spiritual roots."
-- snip --
Moreover, people close to Bush say that he has professed a not-so-secret admiration for the church's discipline and is personally attracted to the breadth and unity of its teachings. A New York priest who has befriended the president said that Bush respects the way Catholicism starts at the foundation -- with the notion that the papacy is willed by God and that the pope is Peter's successor. "I think what fascinates him about Catholicism is its historical plausibility," says this priest. "He does appreciate the systematic theology of the church, its intellectual cogency and stability." The priest also says that Bush "is not unaware of how evangelicalism -- by comparison with Catholicism -- may seem more limited both theologically and historically."
Former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson, another evangelical with an affinity for Catholic teaching, says that the key to understanding Bush's domestic policy is to view it through the lens of Rome. Others go a step further.
Paul Weyrich, an architect of the religious right, detects in Bush shades of former British prime minister Tony Blair, who converted to Catholicism last year. "I think he is a secret believer," Weyrich says of Bush. Similarly, John DiIulio, Bush's first director of faith-based initiatives, has called the president a "closet Catholic." And he was only half-kidding.
My Fourth of July moment...
43 minutes ago






25 comments:
I've long predicted that Bush, like Tony Blair, will convert to Catholicism. He also has an obvious "devotion" so to speak, for the Mother of God. There is also a "non-coincidental" correllation with important "Bush decisions" and Marian feastdays. I seem to remember a few years back the Anchoress writing about that, or something closely related, as well.
You have got to be kidding me. While the President may sound Catholic on many socially-conservative topics such as abortion and gay marriage, this President strays so far away from Catholic teaching on Social Justice that it isn't even funny. This President definitely does not adhere to the doctrine of "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
I see this piece as one more piece of propaganda put out there by the Bush Administration to try and manipulate the electorate that has no interest in digging past the surface.
Yes. One of the mentioned Catholic intellectuals needs to tell him about what constitutes a "just" war!
One other item of note. When "W" met with Pope John Paul II, he tried to gain his endorsement of his candidacy because of the alignment on socially conservative issues. However, the Pope, in his wisdom, blasted W for items such as the plight of the poor and hungry in this nation and for the ill-advised invasion of Iraq.
In other words, W traveled to Rome simply because he felt the photo-op with the Pope would be seen as an implied endorsement!
I have to disagree with you guys, respectfully of course! While I am not a fan of the war myself, I believe Bush did it with a good heart, regardless of how "misguided" that might prove (or not prove) to be, especially in years to come.
Did you see/hear his interview this week with Raymond Arroyo on EWTN, The World Over? It will replay several times this week if you want to hear it or you can download it on Monday.
It always disappointments me when these powerful people "making headway" towards Catholicism are berated for "their faults." Do you ever imagine, like Tony Blair, what they will become AFTER the Eucharist! I think to get as far as they have WITHOUT the Eucharist, and the rest of the Sacarments, is AMAZING.
In the end it's all about love and life. Someday we will all see how many of the "unborn" Bush saved by his "Catholic stand" on pro life issues, especially 'ESC babies'.
Furthermore, one of us or our loved one may someday be saved by an "adult stem cell" cure that might not have ever come to fuition had it not been for GWB.
I don't doubt for a minute that GWB loves God. Subsequently, we know that God works all things for good for those who love him. I certainly good be wrong, but will be shocked if Bush does not, at some point, convert to Catholicsm.
Dcn. Greg, so glad you got a ticket to the papal mass. You deserve it!
Interesting.
Father John Corapi tells a story of the 2000 election. During the contested period, Jeb Bush, a convert to Catholicism and his wife went down to Mexico City to the Cathedral and consecrated the election to the Blessed Virgin Mary before the tilma bearing the image of the Lady of Guadalupe, and prayed for a favorable outcome to the election contest. The decision by the Supreme Court rendered the election to Bush on December 12th - the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
I think the criticism of W posted by some of the commentors here comes not from care about Catholic social teaching, but because he is a Republican and they are a Democrat. If I'm wrong tell me so. I think that puts the anti-Bush rhetoric into perspective.
I think that Catholic Republicans are much more forgiving of Bush's policies than Catholic Democrats. Although I really wonder how a Catholic can belong to a party that supports moral evil in its platform.
For the love of God this guy favors torture !
He favors the death penalty too, but someday when he's a Catholic, via his sacramental "transformation", he will come to know even greater the mercy of God and have, I suspect, a change of heart.
No one is saying he's "pefect" , but some of us ARE saying that he's "more Catholic" than many of our "Catholic" politicians. I found the old link to the Anchoress and the "Bush/Catholic" connectionss, which I happen to find fascinating.
http://theanchoressonline.com/2004/11/23/more-things-in-heaven-and-on-earth-than-are-dreamt/
I also quesiton how "political" some of you guys are by your responses. Ken, FYI, the pope didn't "blast" anyone, especially not GWB. There's a big difference between an honest disagreement and a "blast." See, we all make mistakes!
For years now, i've prayed for G.W. Bush's conversion to Catholicism. We Catholis are in great debt to him and his presidentcy. Appointing Roberts and Alito are only two of many reasons for our gratitude. Were you to ask some of the posters here to choose between the most Holy Roman Catholic Church and the democrat party, the would in all likelyhood go for the latter. Great to see Rick Santorum's name showing up in the Catholic blogosphere--he'd make a terrific Vice President.
I am a conservative Catholic, but I don't know. I just don't know. I liked his social; politics, but he seems to be teamed up with the new world order types in trying to link the Americas (as European leaders have linked Europe) by inter-American superhighways, seeming to give amnesty to illegals (not including refugees, who are ok to let in illegally, provided they are not plants) giving away our waterways to some country or other countries, sending manufacturing jobs abroad to China, starting a war in Iraq, which has run Iraqi Catholics out of the area (just as Clinton's war against Milosevic gave wider access to Europe for Muslims), for some things. It seems the war is putting us into debt with China and parts of the US may actually belong to other nations now. I don't know who is advising him on non-social politics, but maybe ol' Rick should give him non-religious conservative pointers on patriotism. I worry that, unless conspiracy theorists' analyses are wrong or malicious, there could be Washington Masonic roots growing deeper. If I'm wrong, please correct me! Blair's socialist leanings are a bit of a concern as well.
I want to believe his becoming Catholic is good and solid and advised by non-possibly covertly heretical-liberal theologians (who might like total amnesty and a one world order, despite its false peace), something his conservative social politics would seem to contradict (the liberation theology part). Well, I'll be glad for his soul, even if the country gets sold down the river, even if the Yellow River (that is a river in China, right?). We deserve it for going to places like Walmart and K-Mart if we didn't have to.
BTW Anyone who buys Chinese fireworks for the 4th should salute the Chinese flag and sing their anthem. Some can't find a non-Chinese item they need at a price they can afford and they could be excused, unless they can't afford it because their working-class home has video game systems and high-def. tvs, but freakin' fireworks?!
George W. Bush's Warm Embrace Of The Catholic Church
.
I think that George Bush has been an awsome President. I had only wished his Catholic brother Jeb Bush would have ran for President in 2008. Despite the constant verbal onslaught of personal insults, George Bush has never called out any of his critics by name. He has been an ardent defender of life and an advocate of the family. George Bush understands the difference between good and evil, he is even willing to defend good even when the poll numbers will drop. If George Bush becomes a Catholic it will a great day, if not then I will have lived under a President who prays to Jesus Christ and does his best to live his life as a Christian first and politician second. Deacon Greg Kandra at the Deacons Bench explores the Republican George Bush and his warm embrace of the Catholic Church. I think that the Deacon is really telling a story of a political shift that is happening in America, Catholics are starting to become more and more Republican. The Democratic Party will no longer be able to hold back the Catholic throngs leaving the Party. Let me be more clear a party cannot advocate, pay for and encourge the destruction of innocent human life and expect reasonable men and woman to buy the line, " I am against abortion, but I am for womans rights!"
Wow, I most definitely disagree with the implication that GWB is the first "Catholic" president. That is the most ridiculous notion I've ever heard! The late Pope John Paul II publicly denounced the war in Iraq something like forty separate times! It was never a "just war", and never will be. The mentality some of the previous commenters is also ridiculous--trying to imply basically that the Republican party is the "Catholic party" or that being critical of George Bush automatically makes you a Democrat. For the record, I am registered Republican, and am not a Democrat in any way. However, I find it appalling how so many in the "Religious Right" are blind as to how twisted the Republican party has become and continue to believe it can do no wrong. The Republican party is dominated by neoconservatives, bent on increasing the size of government (a very liberal thing to do), waging war in Iraq, attempting to start war in Iran, and eroding our civil liberties through legislation such as the Patriot Act and all its successors. "Republican" is not synonymous with "conservative", especially not in this day and age, and George Bush is neither conservative nor Catholic.
"Although I really wonder how a Catholic can belong to a party that supports moral evil in its platform." ...which is why am NOT a Catholic Republican!
I believe he will turn Catholic,
this President strays so far away from Catholic teaching on Social Justice that it isn't even funny. This President definitely does not adhere to the doctrine of "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
Ken, perhaps you would defend your statement "so far" with some actual facts. BTW, I don't recall the Kennedy clan selling their compound down in West Palm and giving the money to the poor. Maybe they could use if for a homeless shelter? Can you also give some proof that he does not practice the "doctrine" love thy neighbor.
Further President Bush has opted to help with social justice issues through the faith-based initiatives programs. Are they perfect, maybe not, but it is not the responsibility of the Federal Government to creating numerous bureaucracies and departments that do nothing to truly help those in need. Realistically we should have higher local and/or state taxes and lower Federal taxes.
Realistically we should have higher local and/or state taxes and lower Federal taxes.
What I should add is even taxes at these levels the problem with bureacracy still exists. Ideally we should have more money in our own pockets to assist with charitable contributions along with a greater personal involvement in so called social justice issues. Bishop Sheen gave an excellent talk called "Social Work" where he uses the example of the Good Samaritan. He personally helped the man who was lying on the side of the road. He did not wait for a government agent/agency to come to the rescue.
Well, I consider myself libertarian on most issues, so the Bush Presidency has been of great concern to me, and I'm watching this next election with a jaundiced eye. If Bush were to convert for good, I would welcome him as a fellow Catholic. He seems like a genuinely good fellow, and I do not believe him to be fundamentally evil in any way. Naive maybe, but not evil.
However, I can't countenance the idea that he is a "Catholic president" in any way, shape, or form. Despite his heroic stances on abortion, embryonic stem-cell research, and gay marriage, which anyone can justify from a libertarian POV, the wars, torture, spying, and continued economic and political consolidation in the hands of the few and powerful that have been overseen by his office cannot be associated with anything remotely Catholic. Do we not remember Catholic opposition to Communist, Nazi, and Fascist tyranny?
Also, on a very picky note, and specifically because of my libertarian leanings, a lot of people have commented about his support for "faith-based initiatives" as being consistent with the principles of subsidiary. This is completely false. A true understanding of "subsidiary" would have decreased federal taxes and allowed any money saved to be spent by families to support their children, and to be donated to charities that could use it to help those in need. The support of "faith-based initiatives" by a gigantic federal apparatus is just statist pandering. Don't be foolish.
Bush, you will be welcomed, but get ready to repent big time. God Bless!
Brian, I'm not sure from which comments you are drawing the conclusion that his support for "faith based initiatives" is consistens with the principles of subsidiary. I stated that federal taxes should be decreased and more money put into my hands so I can designate which charities receive my monies. I merely stated that to rebut the argument that Pres. Bush is "so far away" from the idea of social justice
I don't agree with all he says, but I like Michael Savage. He usually says nice things about the Catholic Church, unless it does something he thinks is absurd. He seems very conservative: language, borders, culture--something our Church should try adopting regarding ecumenism (be nice to others not of the Faith, but don't sell out whatever isn't nailed down by dogma to please them). He denounced the war also. Still, all in all, the Republican Party has only sent adults who can prepare their souls for physical death in war whereas the Democrat Party sends them to fruitless battles that are deemed holy wars because the U.N. oks them and they also send the unborn and the only-mentally dead to death. There are eugenic elitists in the Republican Party, but they usually support the life of those who cannot defend themselves.
9 CommentsClose this window Jump to comment form
Graubo said...
FYI on Obama from a trying Illinois Catholic:
There is such a late-term abortion procedure where as the induced baby is sometimes born alive. This baby will struggle for oxygen sometimes for hours depending on how developed the lungs are. The cause of death is asphyxiation. This procedure was brought to light by a nurse that was fired from her job for speaking out. Hospital staff could literally be passersby and see a baby, alone on a countertop struggling to breath only to die!
Obama, on legislation, voted "Present". He did not even have the guts to vote "Yea" or "Nay". Why??? Who in their right mind??? Many say that it is his ties to Planned Parenthood.
I would like Obama and his pastor to comment on the polemics of Margeret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, and the Afro-centric message of Trinity UCC. Sanger believed in race superiority decades before Hitler and I wonder why Planned Parenthood sets up "shop" in the poor, inner-city neighborhoods?
We learned our interstate transportation system from Hitler and he learned eugenics from the U.S.
Yea, Obama! What a man! Worth a thousand words, not hardly!
As for references: the hospital is I believe Chicago Lutheran, the nurses first name I believe is Susan, and she testified/spoke on record in Springfield, Illinois in front of some panel. Sorry that I could not be more specific, at one time I heard an interview with her on EWTN radio and I looked up her testimony in Springfield. It is there, you just have to dig a little like I did.
Peace, Graubo
March 28, 2008 7:51 AM
Graubo said...
The nurse is Jill Stanek and she has testified before Illinois lawmakers as well as the U.S. Congress.
Peace, Graubo
March 28, 2008 8:01 AM
johnny b said...
"Obama, unwilling to concede the Catholic vote, plans small round-table meetings and "listening sessions" with Catholic voters in Pennsylvania's urban and rural areas, as well as e-mails and phone banks targeting Catholics."
OHHH how I wish I could be there.
The devil himself has nothing on Hussein Obama. Very cunning. Killing children born alive and he is adored like a god.....Hitler-esqe.
You don't have to scratch very deep to see the intense evil in this man and Hillary as well. Very sad that Roman Catholic men and women are so so duped.
March 28, 2008 6:56 PM
Michael said...
Johnny B, all I would have to do to convince more people to vote for Sen. Obama would be to show them your comment.
March 28, 2008 7:47 PM
Castellanus said...
willing to buck the party on such issues are called "Casey Democrats"
Just what has "bucking the party accomplished?" Nothing!
"Those so-called Casey Democrats... but more important than that, can listen to them, listen to what their concerns are and also listen to them about their faith and their point of view,"
My faith tells me that I cannot support someone who supports abortion. Sen Obama has vehemently repeated his position on abortion and it is non-negotiable. So much for someone willing to listen to my point of view.
March 28, 2008 8:38 PM
Castellanus said...
In a nod to the diverse concerns of Catholic voters, the meetings will focus on Obama's stands on the economy, jobs and health care, said former Indiana Rep. Tim Roemer, who has been reaching out to fellow Catholics on the campaign's behalf.
I wonder, do either of their opinions on healtcare include opt out clauses for Catholic hospitals, pharmacies and other healtcare providers regarding forcing them to perform abortions, pass out birth control or the so called "morning after pill?" Education is an important issue too. Are they willing to allow parents more flexibility in choosing the schools for their children? How about tax credits if I want to send my kids to parochial school? Not gonna happen with the Democrats. So much for the lie that the Democratic position on social issues is common to that of Catholics.
March 28, 2008 8:45 PM
Michael said...
No pharmacist who refuses to fill prescriptions of any kind should be allowed a license. Ever. Pharmacists are not physicians, and do have have any idea of the reason that a particular medication has been prescribed in a particular circumstance. A pharmacist who refuses to fill a particular prescription for "moral reasons" should leave the profession.
March 29, 2008 10:40 AM
Cindy said...
I am a practicing Catholic, and I am voting for Obama.
They are not mutually exclusive roles.
And, neither of them is something that I take lightly nor do I demand that others validate me.
But I did want to say that there are good, decent Catholic people who can, and do, support the message Obama brings to the campaign.
March 29, 2008 9:28 PM
vlodek said...
American catholics need to look deep into their soul and seek true christian meaning of sanctity of life.
How can anyone support a candidate who values gun rights more then life itself?
How about voting for a candidate who supported this horrible war waged with lies in an open opossision to the pope's appeal for peace?
Where is the Christ's teaching in all of this cheerleading to agression and contempt for innocent lives of people in another country?
Do we as catholics value their life as less worthy of living?
Are they loved by God any less?
How can we pray to God to bless our country when we support those who bring war and torture on another people?
Some pundits ask what would Jesus do in this or that, there's no such thing as gospel of war!
It is hipocritical and immoral to support the troops and not ask what they're doing in Iraq !
Christ's "sermon on the Mount" has been forgotten...
April 14, 2008 11:41 PM
Still, in a war, people can prepare to die; in abortion and euthenasia, the victims cannot (unless the latter decided to, but then there's no going back if you get debilitating brain damage). There are Republicans out there who are fine with these things or do the Pontius Pilate thing about it, but, overall, they more often than not vote pro-vulnerable life. I believe, in the Bible, there's a passage to beware not so much those that would kill the body, but those that would kill your soul. The Democrat Party, despite exceptions within, promote that which'll kill the soul. I would vote for neither if Alan Keyes or Ron Paul decide to go Indie, even if there's a good chance they won't win; the conscience will win. I don't trust either party, ultimately. You have to see the social politics of each candidate as conservative and liberal have different categories where those labels most rightly apply. Some are economic conservatives and socially liberal. Beware those that would kill your soul.
I am not Roman Catholic, and I just discovered this excellent blog today. I think maybe you are on to something with thinking that GWB may become Catholic eventually. At the White House welcome for Pope Benedict yesterday, the President did not start his remarks with, "Your Eminence," or "Your Holiness," he said, "Holy Father."
""Although I really wonder how a Catholic can belong to a party that supports moral evil in its platform." ...which is why am NOT a Catholic Republican!" What moral evil does the Rep party support in its platform?
I'm Rep because abortion is intrinsically evil(while this is not true of war/death penalty)and it's in the Dem platform.God does not belong to a party.Let's keep that in mind.However,abortion is instrinsically evil and as a Catholic i cannot support anyone who is pro abortion.Period.
As for the death penalty.Read JPII's statement. It's not opposed totally to the death penalty if understood correctly.
Now we owe it to the Iraqi ppl to leave them with a stable and just system.We can't just abandon them.This is exactly what Pope Benedict stated.We're there and we have a responsibility to the Iraqi ppl.
GWB has been strongly pro life from the day he took office and much maligned and hated by too many.
I've been praying for his conversion for a long time.
Post a Comment